Section 510 forbids acting against a participant for using plan rights or to keep someone from earning a benefit. This page explains what it reaches and how to stay on the right side of it.
This section gives a plain-language reading of Section 510. It offers general information only; laws shift, so verify the current text with counsel.
The statute makes it unlawful to discharge, fine, suspend, expel, discipline or discriminate against a participant or beneficiary for exercising a right under a benefit plan or under ERISA (29 U.S.C. 1140).
It also reaches action taken to interfere with a right someone may later earn, such as vesting or ongoing coverage. Purpose is what counts, so the reason behind the decision is the central fact.
People who provide information or testify in an ERISA inquiry or proceeding are covered too, and lawsuits proceed under ERISA’s civil enforcement provisions (29 U.S.C. 1132).
Most Section 510 claims come from timing. A worker nears vesting, develops a costly medical condition or files a large claim, and then loses a job or hours. Courts look at whether a desire to avoid benefit cost was behind the decision, so a documented, unrelated reason carries real weight.
Layoffs and reorganizations deserve extra care. Selection criteria should be neutral and applied the same way to everyone, and a review that checks whether the list happens to include people near a vesting date or with high claims is a sensible safeguard.
Section 510 does not stop you from changing a plan prospectively under its terms and your plan document. It targets action against individuals for plan-related reasons, so keep plan design decisions separate from individual employment decisions and record both.
Do not weigh an individual’s claims history in a firing or hours decision. Overall plan cost is a design question, not a personnel one.
Take care with terminations close to a retirement or welfare plan milestone, and write down the business reason well before the date arrives.
A clear plan document and SPD help show that changes to the plan were forward-looking and uniform. Our summary plan description guide covers what to include.
Look back over recent terminations for any that fall near vesting, eligibility dates or large claims.
Draft neutral selection criteria before any layoff or hours reduction.
Keep claims data out of the hands of managers who make employment decisions.
Make sure plan changes follow the amendment process in the plan document.
Ask counsel to review any action involving a participant with a claim pending.
Trimming specific employees’ hours to land just under an eligibility line.
Bringing up an employee’s medical costs in a termination meeting.
Using a standard on one person that nobody else was held to.
Believing at-will employment settles the question, when Section 510 is a separate federal limit.
See how Section 510 fits among the other protections for reporting employees.
What layoffs mean for coverage and continuation rights.
Why the formal plan document differs from the enrollment booklet.
29 U.S.C. 1140 (ERISA Section 510) — The anti-retaliation and anti-interference section of ERISA.
29 U.S.C. 1132 (ERISA civil enforcement) — The enforcement provision that says who may sue and what relief is available.
Employee Benefits Security Administration (U.S. Department of Labor) — The EBSA’s materials for those who sponsor plans.
Employers ask these questions again and again; each short reply links onward to the complete guide.
Acting against a participant who uses plan rights, or acting to keep a participant from attaining them.
Any employer sponsoring a covered ERISA plan, whatever its size. Church and governmental plans generally fall outside ERISA.
Changes made under the plan’s terms, going forward and for everyone, are a separate matter from action aimed at one individual.
No. For a decision about a particular person, speak with an ERISA attorney.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.