The Michigan Antitrust Reform Act allows an employer to obtain an agreement not to compete that is reasonable in duration, geographic area and the type of employment or line of business it restricts.
A plain-English summary. This is general information, not legal advice, and the rules change, so check the current text.
The covenant must protect the employer’s reasonable competitive business interests, such as confidential information and customer relationships.
It must be reasonable as to duration, geographical area and the type of employment or line of business.
A court may limit an agreement that is unreasonable in some respect to make it reasonable.
Courts look at the facts of each role. A covenant that is narrowly tied to the employee’s access to confidential information and customers is easier to defend than one that applies to every employee in the same way.
Michigan does not require the covenant to be signed at hire, but consideration and timing matter, and an attorney should review the practice for existing employees.
Keep a signed copy with the personnel file and make sure the employee’s duties match the interests the covenant is meant to protect.
Severance and continued coverage are often offered in return for a covenant. The agreement should state exactly what is provided and what ends the benefit.
Do not end coverage in a way that conflicts with COBRA or the plan terms because of an alleged covenant breach without legal advice.
Align the covenant with the offer letter and the plan documents so the three say the same thing.
Define the Interest. Write down the interest each covenant protects.
Limit the Scope. Set duration, geography and role to what is needed.
Align the Package. Match severance and benefits terms to the covenant.
Have Counsel Review. Send each form to an attorney.
One Form for Everyone. The covenant should fit the role.
Overbroad Terms. Unreasonable terms may be cut back.
Conflicting Benefit Terms. The agreement and plan should agree.
Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, MCL 445.774a — The standard for agreements not to compete.
ERISA section 510, 29 U.S.C. 1140 — Interference with protected benefit rights.
COBRA, 29 U.S.C. 1161 — Continuation coverage after separation.
Short answers to what employers ask most. This is general information, not legal or tax advice.
Yes, when reasonable in duration, geography and type of employment and tied to a legitimate business interest.
A court may limit one to make it reasonable.
Talk to an attorney first.
Yes, the terms should be consistent.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
Employer duties and the benefit-plan questions that follow.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.