Total Compensation Statements

When a competitor offers more salary, the comparison employees make is usually missing half the numbers.

An offer letter shows base pay. It rarely shows the premium contribution, the deductible, the disability coverage or the account deposits that come with it. For employers competing on total package rather than salary alone, we build the document that puts both sides on the same footing, honestly, including where your package is not the stronger one.

Send Us Your Renewal

Making the Comparison Honest

Salary is compared in dollars. Benefits have to be too.

A list of plan names persuades nobody. A benefits package persuades when an employee can see what the same protection would cost them somewhere else.

Paycheck Contributions

A higher salary with a larger premium deduction can take home less. We show the annual employee contribution at each tier, because that is the number a competing offer rarely states. Showing annual contributions makes benefits comparisons fair. Take-home pay is the real comparison.

Out-Of-Pocket Exposure

Deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums decide what a bad year costs a family. For an employee managing a known condition, this line can outweigh a salary difference. Out-of-pocket exposure is a key part of benefits value. A bad year is where plans differ most for a family.

Coverage That Is Hard to Replace

Employer-paid disability, life coverage and HSA deposits never appear in an offer letter, yet would cost the employee real money to buy individually, and some would require medical underwriting. Showing hard-to-replace coverage strengthens retention messaging. Some of it would require medical underwriting to buy.

What Leaving Would Cost

For employees weighing contract or self-employed work, an estimate of the employer-paid coverage they would have to replace can help them weigh the offer. Such a figure is an estimate only, not a quote, and the actual cost of replacement coverage depends on the plan, the individual and the market when they apply.

How each employee’s statement is built →

What Makes It Work

Retention messaging only works if it survives the employee checking it.

Employees considering an offer compare numbers carefully. A document that overstates value damages trust at the moment you most need it.

Only Real Value

We count what the employee would actually lose by leaving, not every program on the books. Leaving out a perk nobody uses makes the total more credible, not less. Counting only real value makes retention messaging credible. Padding makes the total less believable.

Where You Are Weaker

If your deductible is high or your family contribution is above market, the document should not hide it. Managers need to know that before the conversation, not in the middle of it. Honest comparisons prepare managers for retention conversations. Surprises hurt credibility.

Tested Against Market

Claims about value are checked against market contribution and out-of-pocket data first, so the word “competitive” refers to something specific. Market-tested claims keep retention messaging accurate and give managers numbers they can defend when an employee checks. Specific beats vague.

The benchmarks that show where you stand →

Where It Gets Used

The document is most useful in the conversations HR does not run.

Retention decisions happen in manager conversations, recruiting calls and counteroffers. The material has to be ready for all three.

Recruiting

A one-page summary for candidates that turns the package into annual dollar values, so a lower salary offer is judged against the whole package rather than the base alone. Annual dollar values help candidates compare total rewards. The whole package competes, not just salary.

Counteroffers

When a valued employee has another offer, a personal comparison built on their own coverage and tier gives the manager facts rather than impressions. Personal comparisons strengthen counteroffer conversations with facts about the employee’s own coverage and costs. Facts beat impressions.

Manager Briefings

Managers explain benefits poorly because nobody explained the benefits to them. A short briefing with the numbers lets them answer the question they are actually asked. Short briefings help managers explain benefits clearly and answer the questions employees actually ask about their coverage.

How pay and benefits are set together →

Common Questions

What employers ask about retention messaging.

Is this just a sales piece for our benefits?

No. It is a comparison, and a fair one includes the parts of your package that are weaker. Employees trust it precisely because it is not one-sided. Balanced comparisons make retention messaging trustworthy. Employees trust a comparison that admits where the package is weaker.

What if a competitor’s benefits are better?

Then the document shows that, and it becomes an input to the next renewal. Sometimes the answer is a contribution change rather than a raise, and we model both. Market comparisons can shape the next renewal strategy. It becomes a renewal input.

Do you need competitors’ plan details?

Not usually. We use market data by size, industry and region, and when an employee shares a competing offer, we can compare it directly with their permission. Market data makes retention comparisons practical without asking employees for sensitive details from a competing offer.

See the full total compensation program →

Book a 30-minute call