For years the dollar limits sat in the background of design decisions. With the section repealed, the choices have to stand on their own merits.
General information, not legal or tax advice. Check the cited sources before you act.
Back to the overview for the legal history and the other four topics in this series.
Raising cost sharing lowered premium, and HSA-eligible plans grew. The statute counted employer HSA contributions, so they were modeled too.
Some employers modeled narrower networks, tighter benefit schedules and lower flexible spending limits to stay under a projected limit.
The cost ceiling is gone, so a plan that is rich by market standards no longer carries a federal penalty for being rich. Design now follows budget, hiring needs and the claims experience of the group.
Plans built under the old shadow are still in force. A deductible raised to protect a projection may now cost employees more than the group can justify. Because the limits were indexed to a general consumer price measure while medical spending followed its own course, many planners had expected to cross the line eventually; that pressure has disappeared as a legal matter, though not as a budget matter.
Premium trend itself did not go away. The decision to hold, trim or restore benefits is still a cost decision, taken without a statutory trigger.
Look at three levers together: deductible and out-of-pocket maximum, employer contribution to premium and to any HSA, and the network or tier structure. Compare each against what the group spends and what employees say they value. Funding arrangements, such as self-funding or an individual coverage HRA, belong in the same conversation when the group is a fit.
The aim is a deliberate design, not a reflex to reverse every earlier trade-off.
List every design feature that was adopted mainly to stay under a projected limit.
Price each one against current claims and enrollment, then decide whether to keep, adjust or retire it.
Phase any richer benefit in at renewal so the budget impact is visible before it is committed.
Reversing every change at once and shocking the budget.
Forgetting that employer shared responsibility under section 4980H is a separate test and was never affected by the repeal.
Assuming a richer plan is only a benefit decision. It is also a rate decision that carries through every renewal.
How employer HSA contributions and eligible plans work.
When funding claims directly can fit a mid-sized group.
A balanced look at the individual coverage HRA.
Section 4980I, Repealed — The Code section with its repeal note and list of amending laws.
IRS, Affordable Care Act Tax Provisions — IRS statement that the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 repealed section 4980I.
Public Law 116-94 — Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, signed December 20, 2019; Division N, Title I, Section 503 repeals section 4980I.
Section 4980H — Shared responsibility for employers, including assessable payments by applicable large employers.
General information, not legal or tax advice.
Short replies on this page’s topic, each tied to a fuller guide.
That depends on budget and goals rather than on federal law. The repeal removes a penalty that never applied, so the test is whether the added cost buys something the group values.
They can. Their value comes from their own tax treatment and cost-sharing structure, which are independent of the repealed section.
No. Employer shared responsibility under section 4980H is a separate provision, and the repeal of 4980I did not alter it.
How the 40 percent excise tax on high-cost health coverage under IRC 4980I was built, what it measured and why no employer ever paid it.
The timeline of the Cadillac tax: enacted in 2010, postponed in 2015 and 2018, and repealed by Pub. L. 116-94 in December 2019.
With 4980I repealed, employers still report coverage cost on the W-2 (Box 12, Code DD) and still face other excise taxes and fees. A plain summary.
Five questions to close out any lingering Cadillac tax worry: old contract language, budget models, W-2 Code DD, remaining excise taxes and future proposals.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.