ERISA Sections 3(5) and 3(40)

Before you join an association health plan, ask who the employer is.

An association health plan can look like a group plan you buy yourself. Under ERISA it is a different arrangement, and the rules have moved more than once.

Talk To Us About This

The Basics

What An Association Health Plan Is.

An association health plan, or AHP, is group health coverage offered to the member employers of a trade group, chamber, professional society or similar organization. Instead of each employer buying its own policy, members take coverage through one arrangement the association sponsors. The usual pitch is pooled buying power and simpler administration. Whether that holds depends on how the arrangement is built, and that starts with how ERISA defines an employer.

ERISA section 3(5), 29 U.S.C. 1002(5), says the term “employer” includes a group or association of employers acting for an employer in relation to an employee benefit plan. ERISA section 3(40), 29 U.S.C. 1002(40), defines a multiple employer welfare arrangement, or MEWA, as a plan or other arrangement that provides welfare benefits such as medical care to the employees of two or more employers. The statute excludes arrangements set up under collective bargaining agreements and by certain rural cooperatives. An AHP is, in practice, a MEWA.

The employer question matters because it decides whether the association sponsors one plan for all members or whether each member is treated as sponsoring its own. That choice drives which reporting, market and state rules apply.

The Standard

The Employer Test Today.

The Department of Labor has long asked whether a group is a bona fide employer group or association using a facts-and-circumstances review. In its 2024 rescission, the Department describes three recurring criteria from its advisory opinions: the group has a business purpose beyond providing benefits, its members share a genuine commonality of interest, and the participating employers control the benefit program in form and substance. Factors include how members were solicited, who may join and how the group was formed.

There is no regulation text at 29 CFR 2510.3-5 to rely on any more. The 2018 rule that created that section was removed in its entirety, as the next section explains. What remains is the statute and the Department’s earlier guidance, which is why the answer for a given association turns on its own facts.

The Timeline

The 2018 Rule And What Happened To It.

The Department published its final rule, “Definition of ‘Employer’ Under Section 3(5) of ERISA: Association Health Plans,” on June 21, 2018, at 83 FR 28912. It took effect August 20, 2018, with applicability dates of September 1, 2018 for fully insured AHPs, January 1, 2019 for existing self-insured AHPs and April 1, 2019 for new self-insured AHPs. It loosened the employer test and let working owners with no employees take part.

On March 28, 2019, in New York v. United States Department of Labor, 363 F. Supp. 3d 109, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held the rule’s definition of a bona fide group or association, and its working-owner provision, invalid. The Department appealed. According to the Department’s 2024 rulemaking, the appeal was docketed as No. 19-5125 on May 31, 2019, was held in abeyance on February 8, 2021 and remained stayed, with no appellate ruling.

On April 30, 2024, the Department published a final rule, at 89 FR 34106, rescinding the 2018 rule in its entirety, including the related change to 29 CFR 2510.3-3. The rescission took effect July 1, 2024.

Status

Where Things Stand On October 28, 2026.

Final: the 2024 rescission, effective July 1, 2024. Vacated: the 2018 rule’s bona fide group definition and working-owner provision, by the district court in 2019. Rescinded: the 2018 rule as a whole. Proposed: nothing that is in effect.

The federal regulatory agenda lists a new proposed rule on the definition of employer for AHPs, with a proposal date estimated for November 2026. Trade press reported in late August 2026 that a draft was under review at the White House. We searched the Federal Register through today and found no published proposal, and we have not confirmed that review from a government source. Until a rule is proposed, finalized and effective, the facts-and-circumstances approach above is the working standard. We watch this closely and will update this page.

The Comparison

How An AHP Differs From A Plan You Buy Yourself.

When you buy a fully insured group plan yourself, you are the plan sponsor. You hold the contract with a licensed carrier, and your own headcount decides whether you are a small or large group. In an AHP, the association or the arrangement it creates sits between you and the coverage. You join as a member, and the governing documents, the fee schedule and who controls decisions come from that arrangement.

CMS addressed group size in a September 1, 2011 bulletin on coverage sold to or through associations. In the usual case it looks through the association to each member employer, so each employer’s own employee count decides small or large group status. In the rare case where the association itself is the employer, the combined employees of all participating employers decide. The bulletin also says members of one association may land in different markets. Ask the carrier in writing which basis it used for you.

The Filings

Form M-1 And State Regulation.

ERISA section 101(g), 29 U.S.C. 1021(g), directs the Secretary of Labor to require MEWAs that provide medical care to register before operating in a state. The rule, 29 CFR 2520.101-2, requires the administrator to file Form M-1 at least 30 days before operating in a state and annually by March 1. It exempts an entity licensed as a health insurance issuer in every state where it covers employees. Civil penalties for failing to file arise under ERISA section 502(c)(5).

States have a role too. Under ERISA section 514(b)(6), 29 U.S.C. 1144(b)(6), state insurance law may apply to a fully insured MEWA to the extent it sets reserve and contribution standards, and to other MEWAs in addition to ERISA where not inconsistent with it.

Michigan’s Insurance Code of 1956 addresses MEWAs in chapter 70. MCL 500.7004 requires a person establishing or maintaining an employee welfare benefit plan that is a MEWA to hold a certificate of authority, and says the chapter does not apply to a plan or MEWA that is fully insured. MCL 500.7010 sets out the application, which includes governing documents, financial statements and proof of a fidelity bond. Read the statute or ask counsel how it applies to a specific arrangement.

Before You Join

Due Diligence Questions For Employers.

These questions do not call for legal conclusions. They get you documents to hand to your attorney.

1. Who is the plan sponsor, and what documents show the association’s purpose beyond selling coverage?

2. How do member employers control the benefit program in practice?

3. Is the coverage fully insured or self-funded, and who is the carrier or stop-loss insurer?

4. Has Form M-1 been filed, and may we see the filing and any state certificate of authority?

5. Will our group be rated as small or large group, and on what basis?

6. What happens to our coverage, and to claims in process, if the arrangement fails or is challenged?

7. What fees, commissions and reserves sit inside the premium?

8. Who is the named fiduciary, and who produces the Form 5500?

General information, not legal or tax advice.

More On This Topic

Eight Pages To Read Alongside This One.

MEWA and Form M-1 Basics for Employers

What a MEWA is and when the Form M-1 filing applies.

Form M-1 and Form 5500 Disaster Relief

Filing relief that can affect M-1 and 5500 deadlines.

Do We Need to File Form 5500?

The annual report and who has to file it.

Fully Insured, Level-Funded and Self-Funded Plans Compared

Three ways to fund coverage, side by side.

Self-Funded Health Plans for 50 to 500 Employees

When funding claims directly can fit a mid-sized group.

Michigan Self-Funded Health Plan Rules

Michigan rules for employers that fund their own claims.

Self-Funded vs. Insured: Continuation Law

How state continuation rules differ by funding type.

A Compliance Calendar for Your Plan Year

A plan-year view of the dates that matter.

Sources

Laws And Sources

ERISA Section 3, 29 U.S.C. 1002: Definitions of “employer” in paragraph (5) and “multiple employer welfare arrangement” in paragraph (40).

ERISA Section 101, 29 U.S.C. 1021: Subsection (g) on MEWA registration and reporting.

ERISA Section 514, 29 U.S.C. 1144: Paragraph (b)(6) on state regulation of MEWAs.

29 CFR 2520.101-2: Form M-1 filing rules for MEWAs and entities claiming exception.

83 FR 28912, June 21, 2018: The 2018 final rule on the definition of employer for association health plans.

89 FR 34106, April 30, 2024: The final rule rescinding the 2018 rule, with the history of the court case.

Federal Register Entry, 2024-08985: The same rescission on federalregister.gov.

DOL Fact Sheet on the Rescission: The Department’s summary of the rescission.

CMS Bulletin, September 1, 2011: Individual and group market rules for coverage sold to or through associations.

Regulatory Agenda Entry, RIN 1210-AC43: The listed proposed rule on the definition of employer for AHPs.

MCL 500.7004: Michigan certificate of authority requirement for MEWAs.

MCL 500.7010: Michigan MEWA application contents.

General information, not legal or tax advice.

Common Questions

Quick Answers.

Brief answers to what employers ask about association health plans, each linked to a fuller page.

Is an association health plan the same as a group plan I buy myself?

No. In an AHP the association or its arrangement sponsors the coverage and you join as a member. In a plan you buy yourself, you are the sponsor and you hold the contract with the carrier.

Is the 2018 association health plan rule still in effect?

No. A federal court held key parts invalid on March 28, 2019, and the Department of Labor rescinded the rule in full by a final rule effective July 1, 2024. A new proposal is listed on the federal regulatory agenda but was not yet published when we checked.

Does an association health plan file Form M-1?

A MEWA that provides medical care generally must, unless an exemption applies, such as being licensed as a health insurance issuer in every state where it covers employees. The association’s administrator files it, so ask to see it.

Who decides whether my coverage is small group or large group?

CMS guidance usually looks through the association to each member employer, so your own employee count decides. If the association itself is the employer, the combined count of participating employers decides. Ask the carrier which basis applies.

Does Michigan regulate association health plans?

Michigan’s Insurance Code, chapter 70, requires a MEWA that is an employee welfare benefit plan to hold a certificate of authority, and says the chapter does not apply to a plan or MEWA that is fully insured. Ask counsel how it applies to a specific arrangement.

CFH Insurance Consultants

An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.

Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →

Michigan41000 Woodward Avenue, Suite 350 East
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
248.370.8853
Colorado13540 Northgate Estates, Suite 100
Colorado Springs, CO 80921
719.425.2649
Texas16365 Park Ten Place, Suite 182
Houston, TX 77084
281.404.5670

Book a 30-minute call