A medical stop-loss captive lets a mid-size employer self fund while sharing a layer of risk with other employers in the same program. A good pool year can return underwriting profit. A bad one is shared too. We evaluate each program on its terms before we recommend one, and where it fits, we place it.
The structure is simple once the layers are separated. The terms of the middle layer are where programs differ.
Claims up to your own specific deductible are paid by your plan, exactly as in any self-funded arrangement. This is the part you control through plan design and care management. In a group captive, this layer works exactly as it would if you bought stop-loss alone.
Above your deductible, a band of claims is pooled with the other employers in the program. Premiums for this layer fund the pool, and what the pool does not spend can come back to its members. That shared layer is what makes a medical stop-loss captive different.
Catastrophic claims above the captive layer transfer to a stop-loss carrier. No single member’s worst year lands on the pool, and no pool year lands entirely on you. The reinsured layer is what keeps one catastrophic claim from reaching the rest of the captive’s members.
Every captive shows a return in a typical year. What separates a good program from a costly one is written further back.
How members are underwritten and admitted decides the quality of the risk you are sharing. A loose admission standard is a subsidy you pay to the weakest member. Underwriting standards are the first thing to read in any group captive program.
Most programs ask for capital or collateral up front. We confirm how much, where it sits, and when and whether it comes back. Collateral can tie up cash for years in some captive programs, so it belongs in the cash-flow model alongside premium and claims.
Underwriting profit is paid after a plan year’s claims have run out, often a year or more later. We model the cash, not just the headline return. A captive return that arrives years later is worth less than the same amount today, and the model should say so.
Depending on the program, a bad year can reduce your return to nothing or draw on the collateral you posted. We show which, in writing, before you join. That downside is part of the price of any captive, and it belongs in the comparison.
Multi-year commitments and the treatment of your share when you leave decide how reversible the choice is. We read them before we read the projection. A captive that is hard to leave is a longer commitment than a stop-loss policy, so the exit terms deserve the same scrutiny as the projected savings.
Captives typically require pharmacy, care-management and cost-containment programs. Those are a real source of savings and a real change for employees; both belong in the decision. A captive evaluation that leaves out those required programs, and what they change for employees, is incomplete.
We recommend one when the group’s numbers and appetite line up, and say so plainly when they do not.
Employers already large and stable enough to self fund, with reserves to post collateral, a willingness to commit for several years, and leadership that wants the discipline of managed pharmacy and care. For them a captive can steady stop-loss pricing that would otherwise swing with one large claim.
Small groups that benefit from community-rated fully insured pricing, groups with volatile or high claims, and employers who need to be able to leave easily. For them the pool adds commitments without adding value, and we will tell you so.
Your plan is still self funded. The captive changes how the stop-loss layer above your deductible is bought: shared with other employers rather than bought alone from a carrier. You keep your own plan design, your own claims data and your own specific deductible.
Yes. We place a captive built for pre-Medicare retirees, the population that most often breaks a retiree budget, with its own design decisions and trade-offs. Pre-Medicare retirees carry claims that are hard to budget, which is why a pooled layer can help there.
The program’s administrator and carriers. We evaluate and place the arrangement and manage the vendors behind it every year; we do not administer the plan ourselves. That separation keeps the evaluation clear: our job is to judge whether the captive is working for you.
We’ll tell you whether it looks competitive, where we see opportunity, and the five questions we’d put to your carrier. No cost, and no obligation to move anything.
The renewal letter
Your current plan summary
Contribution split by tier
Enrolled counts by tier
Four documents — two more if your group is 50 or more. Nothing else; every extra one is a reason to postpone.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.