The FLSA analysis asks what the working relationship really looks like, regardless of what the contract calls it. The sections below set out the factors and urge caution in applying them.
Consider this an introduction, not counsel. Since the Labor Department has rewritten its classification rule several times, make sure you are reading the version now in force.
Whether the worker can earn more or lose money through managerial skill, pricing or investment points toward contractor status.
Substantial worker investment in equipment and an indefinite, exclusive relationship are weighed against each other.
The degree of control over how, when and where work is done, and whether the work is part of the employer’s core business, both matter.
The Labor Department’s regulation at 29 C.F.R. Part 795 sets out several factors weighed together, with none controlling. Because the agency’s enforcement stance has moved from one administration to the next, confirm which version is in force.
A written contractor agreement helps but does not control. If the worker is economically dependent in practice, a court can treat them as an employee regardless of the label.
Misclassification can bring back wages, overtime, penalties and tax liabilities, and it may expose the employer to claims that the worker should have been offered benefits.
Where plan terms are loosely written, a worker later deemed an employee may argue for retroactive coverage. Precise eligibility wording reduces that risk.
For large employers, misclassified workers can count as full-time employees and raise penalty risk.
If a worker is converted, plan the enrollment, waiting period and notice steps.
List all contractors and describe each relationship.
Score each against the factors.
Reclassify any worker who is economically dependent.
Update contractor agreements to reflect reality.
Review plan documents for contractor exclusion language.
Relying on a contractor label or a signed agreement alone.
Treating a long-term exclusive worker as a contractor.
Ignoring that different agencies use different tests.
Reclassifying without telling benefits counsel.
Return to the parent guide.
Eligibility rules.
Related wage rules.
FLSA definitions, 29 U.S.C. 203 — Statutory definitions behind the economic reality analysis.
DOL classification rule, 29 C.F.R. Part 795 — Independent contractor status under the FLSA.
DOL: Employee or Independent Contractor — Agency guidance.
ACA mandate, 26 U.S.C. 4980H — The route by which a classification error can turn into an ACA penalty.
Employers ask about worker classification in these terms most; each short reply leads to the full guide.
No. The relationship in practice controls.
It depends on the claim. Federal wage law uses the economic reality test; other laws use different tests.
Yes, different laws use different tests.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.