No statute prescribes the steps of an internal investigation, but courts and the EEOC expect one that is prompt, thorough and impartial. This guide sets out those standards in practical terms.
General guidance only, not legal advice. Standards for investigations are refined by courts and agencies, so check current sources.
Start the process quickly after a report, put interim protections in place, and finish within a reasonable and documented time rather than letting the matter drift.
The investigator should have no stake in the outcome, no reporting line to the accused, and no prior view of the facts.
Interview the complainant, the accused and witnesses, collect documents, record findings and the reasoning for the conclusion.
In Faragher and Ellerth the Supreme Court tied an employer’s defense to its exercise of reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct harassment. How the employer responded to a complaint is therefore central evidence.
The EEOC’s enforcement guidance describes an adequate response as one that is prompt, fair and proportionate, with corrective action reasonably designed to stop the conduct. A written outline of steps and a file kept by one custodian make the record easier to defend.
Tell both sides what to expect, remind them that retaliation is prohibited, and close the loop in writing without disclosing more than necessary.
Interim schedule or leave changes should not cut hours below plan eligibility thresholds for the complainant.
Paid leave generally keeps employees active under the plan; unpaid leave may trigger plan eligibility or COBRA questions.
Keep the finished file under the applicable retention rules, and store it away from both the personnel file and the benefits records.
Write a one-page investigation procedure with named roles.
Choose an investigator with no conflict of interest.
Set a target timeline and record any delay and its reason.
Prepare interview outlines and a standard confidentiality reminder.
Close with a written outcome and a follow-up check.
Letting the accused’s manager run the investigation.
Reaching a conclusion before interviews are complete.
Promising total confidentiality that you cannot keep.
Failing to document the reason for the outcome.
Return to the parent guide.
What triggers an investigation.
Complaint procedures.
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 — Employer’s defense where it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct harassment.
Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 — Vicarious liability.
Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2202 — State-law employer obligations on discrimination and harassment.
Quick responses to the investigation-standard questions employers bring us, each linked to the complete guide.
There is no fixed number, but it should start promptly and conclude within a reasonable time on the facts, with delays recorded.
No, but the person must be impartial and trained. Outside investigators suit cases involving senior leaders.
Only to the extent the process permits; tell participants up front that information goes to those who need it.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
A companion guide in the same series.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.