A new group with no history is priced on assumptions. Claims history from the parent, handled properly, lets carriers price the divested business on its own experience.
Ask the parent for experience limited to the transferring population, in a form that respects privacy limits.
Health information is protected, so data is typically de-identified, aggregated or reviewed by a limited team.
Parent-wide experience must be separated to show only the transferring employees and dependents.
A few high-cost claims can set pricing, so they are identified and addressed in underwriting.
Drug spend and specialty utilization shape the pharmacy contract and the stop-loss view.
A clean, accurate submission improves quotes and shortens underwriting.
Health information is protected, so the parent usually shares it in aggregated or de-identified form, or through a limited team under confidentiality terms. The goal is to give a carrier enough to price the group on its own experience without revealing who the claimants are.
The submission matters. Present the experience for the transferring population only, by month, with large claims described and pharmacy spend identified. A carrier that can follow the data will often price more confidently, while one that sees only a parent-wide average will add a margin for the unknown.
Plain answers for HR, finance and deal teams.
Usually yes in a limited form. Privacy rules restrict what can be shared, so the format is agreed in advance.
Typically a year or more of paid claims, with enrollment, so trend and large claims can be seen.
Self-funded parents often hold detailed claims, but the stop-loss carrier and administrator may need to release them.
Carriers price from demographics and industry norms, which is usually less favorable than a clean experience.
Often, or shared through a restricted team. Counsel or the privacy officer should confirm the approach.
They can lead to higher stop-loss attachment points or specific exclusions, so addressing them early matters.
We build it from the data the parent provides, working with HR, finance and counsel.
Depends on how quickly data arrives. The analysis itself is quick once the file is clean.
Rights to the data are set by the deal documents and privacy law, so check the agreement.
A claims summary for the divested population and a carrier-ready experience package.
A few high-cost claimants can drive the experience of a small group, so carriers look at them specifically and may price them differently or exclude them in stop-loss.
Ask what is possible, such as an estimate by headcount share, and tell carriers how the figures were derived so they can judge reliability.
Ready? Upload your renewal, or talk it through with someone first. No cost, no obligation.
General information about a carve-out claims review, not legal or tax advice. Plan-specific questions belong with your counsel and tax advisor, and we will bring them in.
The page this belongs to.
The full section.
Controlling the highest-cost drugs.
We’ll tell you whether it looks competitive, where we see opportunity, and the five questions we’d put to your carrier. No cost, and no obligation to move anything.
The renewal letter
Your current plan summary
Contribution split by tier
Enrolled counts by tier
Four documents, two more if your group is 50 or more. Nothing else; every extra one is a reason to postpone.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →
We use cookies to keep the site working properly and to understand how it is used. You can decline anything that is not essential. See our Privacy Policy for the detail.