At this size it stops being an HR conversation.
Above 250 employees your CFO is in the room. Your plan is probably self-funded, or should be. Your stop-loss placement is worth real money.
And you likely have people in more than one state, which means more than one set of rules. The question is not whether your broker can get you a quote. It is whether they can sit across from your CFO with the claims data and defend a three-year plan.
The stop-loss is where the money is.
Above 250 lives, self-funding stops being the exception and starts being the default. The decisions that matter shift from whether to self-fund to how the risk is actually structured.
Funding Architecture
This is the range where self-funding becomes the norm. KFF’s 2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey found 27% of covered workers at firms with 10–199 employees are in self-funded plans, versus 80% at firms with 200 or more — most employers in this band are self-funded or actively evaluating it for the first time.
We build the self-funding business case on your real numbers — claims history, stop-loss quotes, cash-flow impact — rather than a generic pitch, and manage the transition if you move.
Stop-Loss & Risk Management
Self-funded plans this size carry real stop-loss decisions: specific attachment points, aggregate attachment, whether the policy is written on a contract basis or a paid basis, and whether “lasering” — excluding a known high-cost claimant from coverage — is on the table at renewal.
We review the stop-loss contract language, not just the premium, and push back on lasering before it is presented as a foregone conclusion.
Multi-Site & Compliance Complexity
See the full compliance calendar and what applies at your size →
Employers this size commonly operate across multiple states or offices, which means network adequacy varies by location and compliance obligations — state mandates, multi-state COBRA administration — multiply instead of averaging out.
Licensed well beyond Michigan, with offices in Michigan, Colorado and Texas, we handle multi-state network and compliance questions directly instead of routing them to a call center.
Governance & Strategic Involvement
A CFO or benefits committee is usually involved in plan decisions at this size, and the annual renewal becomes an input to budget planning rather than a formality.
At this size leadership coverage usually needs its own look; group life and disability rarely keep pace with senior pay. See executive benefits.
We come to that meeting with the analysis already built, so the conversation is about the decision, not about assembling the data first.
The published trend stopped describing you a while ago.
Michigan publishes every carrier’s approved rate change, and at your size almost none of it applies to you.
Where the Filed Numbers Stop
Rates are filed with the state only for fully insured groups under fifty. Above that they are not filed at all, and a self-funded plan has no filed rate because it is not buying one. So the statewide averages that get quoted in the trade press — 11.1 percent approved for small group in 2026, 9.6 percent proposed for 2027 — describe a market you have already left.
What Moves Instead, on Three Different Clocks
Your cost is claims, administration and stop-loss, and they do not move together. Stop-loss is the fastest: premiums rose roughly fourteen to sixteen percent for 2026 depending on deductible. The reason is leveraged trend — your deductible stays where it is while the claims sitting above it grow, so a year in which claims rose ten percent can produce a stop-loss renewal in the thirties with nothing unusual having happened.
At your size a single catastrophic claimant is a large enough share of the budget that this is not a rounding error, and an average of your three components is not a number anyone can act on. The figure worth having is each one measured on its own and set against what the market did — which takes the last few renewals, not only this year’s.
This is the band where both numbers matter at once.
A renewal is your own claims experience blended with the carrier’s book rate, and what sets the mix is enrolled contracts, not employees. Full credibility is commonly reached at a thousand. Around five hundred contracts the two halves carry equal weight — the only place on the scale where that is true.
| Enrolled Contracts | Your Own Claims | The Book Rate | What That Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 2.5% | 97.5% | Your claims year is almost invisible in the rate. |
| 50 | 5% | 95% | About where carriers start releasing claims information at all. |
| 100 | 10% | 90% | Nine tenths of the increase describes the market, not you. |
| 250 | 25% | 75% | Still mostly the book — but one large claimant now shows. |
| 500 | 50% | 50% | The market figure and your own experience carry equal weight. |
| 750 | 75% | 25% | Mostly your own claims. The market number is context now. |
| 1,000+ | 100% | — | The renewal is your own claims experience, priced. |
Employers between 250 and 999 sit across the shaded rows, and where exactly depends on take-up rather than headcount. Each carrier sets its own schedule, so treat the table as the shape rather than the arithmetic — the factor actually applied to your group is printed on your rate exhibit, usually beside the pooling point. You can run the same arithmetic on your own figures with our renewal decoder.
Half the increase is yours. Half is not.
That is what makes this band different from every other one. A single number that mixes the two together cannot be argued with, because nobody can say which half moved. The work here is the decomposition: how much of the increase is market trend, how much is your own claims year, and how much is a pricing decision the carrier made about its whole block.
Which is why shopping alone stops being the answer.
A competing carrier underwrites the same claims your incumbent has just seen, so there is less room for a different answer than there was a hundred contracts ago. What is available instead is the cost driver itself — where the spend concentrates and what sits behind it. Left in place, it simply moves to the next carrier with you.
Moving your own half is slower work: the claims you improve this year become part of next year’s rate. That is what a year-round health and cost strategy is for.
What employers your size ask us.
We are already self-funded. What is left to do?
Usually the stop-loss. It is the part most often rolled rather than marketed, and it is where a large employer’s easiest savings tend to sit. Marketing it means comparing contract terms as well as price: the contract basis, rate caps, whether reimbursement is advanced on a large claim, and who decides what counts as an eligible expense. Two quotes at the same premium can protect very different amounts of risk.
We have staff in six states. Can you handle that?
Yes. We are licensed well beyond Michigan, with offices in Bloomfield Hills, Colorado Springs and Houston, and we support multinational populations. In practice that means checking the network where each group of employees lives, confirming which state mandates reach an insured plan versus a self-funded one, and keeping continuation and leave rules straight for each location. One program, with the local differences written down.
Are we not better off with a national firm?
National firms have the resources and hand you a service tier. With us you get five named people, plus the benchmarking data and the compliance bench of a firm built to back them. Ask both what happens when you call in February.
Industry decides which cost driver you are actually managing.
At several hundred employees the plan is no longer one population. It is shifts, sites, job classes and contract types, and the cost driver that dominates is an industry fact rather than a benefits one.
Manufacturing
Multiple plants, union and non-union populations on one program, and plan designs that have to survive a bargaining cycle as well as a renewal. The practical issue is timing: a bargaining agreement can lock contributions or plan design while the non-union plan renews every year, so changes have to be planned around the contract calendar. We model both populations together so a change for one does not create a cost problem for the other.
Health Care and Social Assistance
Around-the-clock staffing and heavy per-diem use make measurement periods a standing administrative burden rather than an annual exercise. Per-diem nurses and aides whose hours swing can move in and out of full-time status, and each change affects both the offer and the 1095-C. A look-back method, set up once and applied consistently, keeps those decisions defensible and stops coverage from switching on and off.
Transportation and Warehousing
Distributed sites and a mobile workforce make network adequacy a real question, and injury exposure puts disability and leave coordination in front of you. Disability, leave and workers’ comp have to be coordinated so an injured employee is not paid twice or left without income between programs. The network check needs to follow where drivers actually live, which is not necessarily where the terminal is.
Educational Services
An academic calendar, adjuncts and variable-hour staff mean eligibility has to be defined against a year that does not run January to December. Adjuncts and variable-hour instructors are usually measured with a look-back period, and summer breaks raise the question of whether coverage continues through them. The plan and the payroll schedule have to answer that the same way, especially where pay is spread differently from the school year.
Every sector we serve
- Accommodation and Food Services
- Administrative and Support and Waste Management
- Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
- Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
- Construction
- Educational Services
- Finance and Insurance
- Health Care and Social Assistance
- Information
- Management of Companies and Enterprises
- Manufacturing
- Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
- Mortgage lending
- Other Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Public Administration
- Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
- Retail Trade
- Transportation and Warehousing
- Utilities
- Wholesale Trade
At this size the plan is something you manage, not something you buy
Ten questions from employers who are already self-funded and want to know what good looks like.
What should we be measuring that we probably are not?
Where the money concentrates. In most plans this size a small number of claimants account for a very large share of spend, so an average tells you almost nothing. The useful views are the distribution of claims by size, what is driving the top of it, how much of your pharmacy spend sits in specialty, and how your fixed costs compare to your claims costs. If your current reporting is a monthly loss ratio, you are flying on one instrument.
How often should we market stop-loss?
Most employers this size should test it annually and expect to move it less often than that. Stop-loss pricing is driven by your large-claim history and by the carrier’s view of what is ongoing, so it moves independently of your medical renewal. The trap is loyalty pricing that quietly drifts – the incumbent knows your claimants better than the market does, which cuts both ways.
What is lasering, and should we accept it?
A laser is a higher specific deductible applied to one named individual with a known condition, in exchange for a lower rate on everybody else. It can be sensible or it can be the carrier handing you back exactly the risk you bought protection against. What matters is the size of the laser against your tolerance, and whether there is no-new-laser protection and a rate cap at renewal. Never evaluate a lasered quote on the premium alone.
A single catastrophic claim has blown up our year. What now?
First, confirm the stop-loss filing is clean and timely, because late notice is where recoveries get lost. Then separate what is recurring from what is not – a one-time surgical event and an ongoing course of treatment have completely different renewal consequences. Then look at case management and centers of excellence for the ongoing piece. Panicking into a funding change mid-course usually costs more than it saves.
What does good pharmacy management look like at this size?
It starts with knowing whether your pharmacy benefit is bundled with your medical carrier or carved out to a separate manager, because that determines what you can see and what you can change. The questions worth asking are how rebates flow and to whom, how specialty is dispensed and priced, and whether the formulary is doing clinical work or commercial work. Specialty is where the growth is, and it is where the least transparency sits.
Should we be looking at reference-based pricing?
It is worth modeling, not adopting on principle. Instead of paying a negotiated discount off a hospital’s own chargemaster, you pay a defined multiple of a public benchmark. The savings can be real and so can the friction, because a provider who has not agreed to the price can bill the member for the difference. It works where there is strong member advocacy behind it and an employer prepared to hold the line.
What does fiduciary responsibility actually require of us?
That decisions about the plan are made in the participants’ interest, on a documented basis, by people who know they are making them. In practice that means a named fiduciary, a committee that meets and keeps minutes, a process for reviewing fees and vendors, and evidence that you looked at what service providers are paid – which brokers and consultants now have to disclose to you in writing. The exposure is rarely the decision. It is the absence of a record of how it was reached.
How do we evaluate whether our administrator is doing a good job?
On things that can be counted. Claim turnaround and accuracy, first-call resolution, how eligibility discrepancies are found and cleared, how quickly appeals move, and whether reporting arrives without being chased. We are not an administrator ourselves – we find, vet and manage the ones our clients use – which is precisely why we are willing to hold one to a scorecard.
What is the real cost of a disruptive network change?
More than the spreadsheet shows. Model the savings, then model disruption properly: how many members currently see a provider who would fall out of network, how concentrated that is in one system, and what happens to anyone mid-course of treatment. A change that saves money and sends a hundred people looking for a new physician in January has a cost that lands on HR rather than on the plan.
How do we compare ourselves to peers without guessing?
By holding the things that are not strategy constant. Age, family mix, geography and plan richness all move cost, so a raw per-employee comparison to a national average is close to meaningless. The comparison worth having sets your plan against employers of similar profile and then splits the gap into price and utilization, because one is a contracting problem and the other is a health problem.
Want this on your own numbers? Send us your renewal, or talk it through with someone first. No cost, no obligation.
General information about group benefits, not legal or tax advice. Plan-specific questions belong with ERISA counsel, and we will bring them in.
Bring us your renewal and your stop-loss.
We’ll benchmark the plan, read the claims, and tell you what we’d market and why. No cost, and no obligation to move anything.
An independent employee benefits consulting firm. We look at the entire benefits program — cost, plan performance, risk and administration.
Switch to CFH. Unhappy with your broker? Your employees won’t notice. You will. →